vicen 寫到: | ||
---|---|---|
u大 感謝您為廣大巴友的奉獻 敬佩敬佩~~ ![]() 感謝樓上的watchme巴友前輩直接致電勞力士總部洽詢 已經可以得到確定的答案了~就是不論錶殼錶帶全部都是904L ![]() |
功德無量
發表人 | 內容 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
shienhc
進階會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
chenwatch
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Watchme
新進會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
cwlan
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
cwlan
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
http://www.rolex.com/zh-Hant#/rolex-watches/rolexdeepsea/glidelock/
http://www.rolex.com/en#/rolex-watches/rolexdeepsea/glidelock/ 勞力士官網: 全新的Rolex Deepsea配備抗侵蝕性的雙延展系統錶帶,由含鉻較高的904L不鏽鋼打造...... Created from 904L steel with a higher chromium content the corrosion resistant double expansion bracelet on the new Rolex Sea Dweller DEEPSEA was designed for a life underwater...... 如果全系列SS錶帶都是904L,為何官網只特別針對DS說明...? ![]() |
||||
cwlan
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
cwlan
終極會員 ![]() ![]() |
Rolex bracelet question
http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tree&goto=4034019&rid=32318 引段NicoH先生的文章 Hey Joe, we’ve had this discussion over and over on a German board. Finally someone had his GMT-Master II, Z-series 2007, analyzed with an x-ray-based analyzing tool and it turned out that the case was made of 904L indeed but bracelet and clasp were made of 316L. This was also confirmed by Thomas Ernst (a journalist who supposedly was a former Rolex employee) who said that the DeepSea Seadweller is the first stainless steel Rolex to use 904L in the bracelet as well. That’s what I read... Cheers- Nico 持續困惑中.....慢慢來找德國佬的討論串 ![]() |
||||
BENZKING
中級會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
killkid1127
新進會員 ![]() ![]() |
|||||
allenzi
資深會員 ![]() ![]() |
成本真的只差幾元的話,其他錶廠早就跟進了 像swatch多會做生意,一個007他不知道出了多少版本,奧運會多少錢都一定要標到廣告贊助(大陸滿坑滿谷的廣告燈箱),所有代言人演員運動員名模全部都是頂級的一時之選。。。 加一點成本而已,Omega會讓R獨享904L這個噱頭這麼久?一定是跟著做,而且宣傳更大聲。。。 像swatch多會做生意, |
||||