| 發表人 | 內容 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Galileo
進階會員  |
發表於: 星期日 2007-10-14 23:52
對我而言, 不鏽鋼, K金機芯都相同, 但K金價差就很多, 秤重量似乎比純金還貴, 我覺得不值得! 或許是等級還不到那裏吧! 不過基本上這是個漸長知識的網站, 凡是息事為主互相交流心得就好!
|
||||
|
submariner3135
終極會員   |
發表於: 星期一 2007-10-15 00:34
大家Take it easy!! 別傷了和氣...... 勞迷有容乃大, 可以理性辯論, 但是不要像某些廠牌的死硬派支持者一樣, 什麼都說不得. 這種井底之蛙, 實在是很可憐, 但不值得同情. poppoppop兄: 現在才發現您妙語如珠, 跟P大一樣, 有意思......!! 
|
||||
|
tiger
資深會員   |
發表於: 星期一 2007-10-15 18:57
submariner3135大大... 您實在太擡舉那些死硬派了... 什麼"井底之蛙"... 根本是"井底的蝌蚪"...對吧?!~ 哈~ Take it easy!! 
|
||||
|
ccchiui
資深會員  |
|||||
|
fiveguys
初級會員  |
|||||
|
Hau
終極會員 |
發表於: 星期二 2007-10-16 00:38
part1
精采精采 
part2 換submariner3135和tiger前輩開砲 _________________ 曾經滄海難為水，除卻巫山不是雲 |
||||
|
jones59
終極會員  |
發表於: 星期二 2007-10-16 01:15
看吵翻天的文..真想睡...LET IT RAIN !! 聽歌 停火吧!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvAPRIwX5KU |
||||
|
TOMTOM
終極會員  |
發表於: 星期二 2007-10-16 11:30
管它金錶鋼錶...會漲的就是好錶...
單就保值與否這個選項來說~ _________________ 如果說 Patek Philippe 是貴族的十字徽章，那麼 Rolex 就像是凡人的王者標記 |
||||
|
harrison_cheng
資深會員  |
發表於: 星期二 2007-10-16 12:02
這個主題好玩,不過我絕得好像很難一體適用,就拿半金的來說,如果全金的好過不秀剛,這個邏輯對,那也應該適用半金的阿,因為金的部分還是多過不秀剛的,可是這好像只適用部分的表款,很難一體適用.所以大家不用爭吵.可能版主您收的那些都是對的,可是也不一定適用所有的情況,最主要還是跟供需有關,尤其是表.
|
||||
|
watchbus134
初級會員 |
發表於: 星期二 2007-10-16 14:22
I think I must say something more since I created this topic. This one is more polular (40 viewers per one response vs another one which I fight for WG that is 25 viewers per one response). Like you said it's an interesting topic which will cater many viewers. This proves that media is always easy to maneuver and easy to get effect that you expected to have.
So is easy for traders who pile up watchs for sale at better price!
Demand and supply are basic rule for market. I know many people looking for SS Daytona which is so popular but with rare ocasion that you can see it in a Rolex store. This violates the common rule that company to maximize its value with P*Q .  But one should not forget that this economics rule only apply to pure competitive market. Unlike DRAM, Rolex has made itself outstanding in the market for so long with great success in every aspects. It has the power to decide the vaule of each watch it made. Like USA prints its bill and marked $100 or $1. They are currency that's liable to every one from US treasury. Rolex is pretty much like that. Should Rolex keep doing that well in the future (which everybody agree it should) SS daytona and all other items will has its steady value, which I think ROLEX will be happy and keen to do so.
In finance, that's bid/offer price represents an asset's liquidity. Normally only one thing without bid/offer spread that's a country's currency using in the same country (ie you bring NTD100 to buy a coffee, later the same NTD100 will be going to another's pocket at NTD100, if a coffee store should give change). I think most of us know liquidity is key to keep a 2nd hand watch sotore alive. There is only one watch brand that can replace money to keep the store in current, that is ROLEX. Other brands not acting like currency as ROLEX do. Knowing of this, so it is safe to change your money into a Rolex. Go buy it now! I like to see everybody get wealthy. 
|
||||
第6頁(共9頁)
您 無法 在這個版面發表文章
您 無法 在這個版面回覆文章
您 無法 在這個版面編輯文章
您 無法 在這個版面刪除文章
您 無法 在這個版面進行投票
您 無法 在這個版面上傳附加圖檔
您 可以 在這個版面下載已上傳之附加圖檔
您 無法 在這個版面回覆文章
您 無法 在這個版面編輯文章
您 無法 在這個版面刪除文章
您 無法 在這個版面進行投票
您 無法 在這個版面上傳附加圖檔
您 可以 在這個版面下載已上傳之附加圖檔