WatchBus 手錶討論區 :: 觀看文章 - 如果在荒島上
開新主題 回覆文章 Share
如果在荒島上
前往頁面 1, 2  下一頁
發表人 內容
ericni
資深會員
資深會員
發表 發表於: 星期四 2004-06-17 23:26
引言回覆

問個好玩的問題, (以前我自己常想)
如果哪天被丟在一個荒島上,
只有你的手錶與野外求生物品陪著你,
你會希望是哪隻錶,
排出前三名吧! 嘲笑

(應該很多人首選會給 Rolex 16600 吧, 我自己就是!)
16610 排第二, 第三就給 GS GMT 好了!
Boris
終極會員
終極會員
發表 發表於: 星期四 2004-06-17 23:38
引言回覆

Breitling Emergency
flyback
歐美特派員
歐美特派員
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 00:32
引言回覆

Boris 寫到:
Breitling Emergency


Hi Boris,

What if you run out of battery before the rescuers pick up the transmitter signal? 眨眼

but then at least you have a shot at getting to the rescurers.
chipoh
白金會員
白金會員
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 01:55
引言回覆

請問Breitling Emergency 有甚麼厲害的地方?
flyback
歐美特派員
歐美特派員
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 03:13
引言回覆

chipoh 寫到:
請問Breitling Emergency 有甚麼厲害的地方?


from Cigar Aficionardo (yes, it's a strange place to see the description)

引言回覆:
Breitling engineered its Emergency watches with homing beacons that complement a downed aircraft's own distress signal. When activated, the miniaturized transmitter broadcasts a signal on the 121.5 MHz aviation distress frequency at a range of approximately 100 miles. That frequency is monitored up by Cospas-Sarsat, an international search-and-rescue operation. The watch's rescue signal will remain operational for 48 hours. (The batteries that operate the watch are separate from those that power the transmitter.)
jamesyu26
進階會員
進階會員
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 06:53
引言回覆

I will wear my PANERAI
Omega
分區版面管理員
分區版面管理員
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 08:21
引言回覆

Boris 寫到:
Breitling Emergency

I concur !!!
At least I got the chance to send out SOS signal!!! 哈 哈 哈


Omega 在 星期五 2004-06-18 13:08 作了第 1 次修改
sadinfish
中級會員
中級會員
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 08:32
引言回覆

Breitling Emergency

sadinfish
Kevin
腕錶巴士團隊
腕錶巴士團隊
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 11:21
引言回覆

The Breitling Emergency is not just a fancy watch, it did save lives in the reality.

See the fllowing article for further details.
It was from the Guardian Unlimited.



Explorers or boys messing about? Either way, taxpayer gets rescue bill

Helicopter duo plucked from liferaft after Antarctic crash

Steven Morris
Tuesday January 28, 2003
The Guardian

Their last expedition ended in farce when the Russians threatened to send in military planes to intercept them as they tried to cross into Siberia via the icebound Bering Strait.
Yesterday a new adventure undertaken by British explorers Steve Brooks and Quentin Smith almost led to tragedy when their helicopter plunged into the sea off Antarctica.

The men were plucked from the icy water by a Chilean naval ship after a nine-hour rescue which began when Mr Brooks contacted his wife, Jo Vestey, on his satellite phone asking for assistance. The rescue involved the Royal Navy, the RAF and British coastguards.

Last night there was resentment in some quarters that the men's adventure had cost the taxpayers of Britain and Chile tens of thousands of pounds.

Experts questioned the wisdom of taking a small helicopter - the four-seater Robinson R44 has a single engine - into such a hostile environment.

There was also confusion about what exactly the men were trying to achieve. A website set up to promote the Bering Strait expedition claims the team were planning to fly from the north to south pole in their "trusty helicopter".

But Ms Vestey claimed she did not know what the pair were up to, describing them as "boys messing about with a helicopter."

The drama began at around 1am British time when Mr Brooks, 42, and 40-year-old Mr Smith, also known as Q, ditched into the sea 100 miles off Antarctica, about 36 miles north of Smith Island, and scrambled into their liferaft.

Mr Brooks called his wife in London on his satellite phone. She said: "He said they were both in the liferaft but were okay and could I call the emergency people?"


(Quentin Smith and Steve Brooks)

Meanwhile, distress signals were being beamed from the ditched helicopter and from Mr Brooks' Breitling emergency watch, a wedding present.

The signals from the aircraft were deciphered by Falmouth coastguard and passed on to the rescue coordination centre at RAF Kinloss in Scotland.


The Royal Navy's ice patrol ship, HMS Endurance, which was 180 miles away surveying uncharted waters, began steaming towards the scene and dispatched its two Lynx helicopters.

One was driven back because of poor visibility but the second was on its way when the men were picked up by a Chilean naval vessel at about 10.20am British time.

Though the pair wore survival suits and the weather at the spot where they ditched was clear, one Antarctic explorer told Mr Brooks' wife it was "nothing short of a miracle" that they had survived.

Both men are experienced adventurers. Mr Brooks, a property developer from London, has taken part in expeditions to 70 countries in 15 years. He has trekked solo to Everest base camp and walked barefoot for three days in the Himalayas. He has negotiated the white water rapids of the Zambezi river by kayak and survived a charge by a silver back gorilla in the Congo. He is also a qualified mechanical engineer and pilot.

He and his wife spent their honeymoon flying the helicopter from Alaska to Chile. The 16,000-mile trip took three months.

Mr Smith, also from London, claims to have been flying since the age of five. He has twice flown a helicopter around the globe and won the world freestyle helicopter flying championship.

Despite their experience, it is not the first time they have hit the headlines for the wrong reasons.

In April, Mr Brooks and another explorer, Graham Stratford, were poised to become the first to complete a crossing of the 56-mile wide frozen Bering Strait between the US and Russia in an amphibious vehicle, Snowbird VI, which could carve its way through ice floes and float in the water in between.

But they were forced to call a halt after the Russian authorities told them they would scramble military helicopters to lift them off the ice if they crossed the border.

Ironically, one of the aims of the expedition, for which Mr Smith provided air back-up, was to demonstrate how good relations between east and west had become.

The wisdom of the team's latest adventure was questioned by, among others, Günter Endres, editor of Jane's Helicopter Markets and Systems, said: "I'm surprised they used the R44. I wouldn't use a helicopter like that to go so far over the sea. It sounds as if they were pushing it to the maximum."

A spokesman for the pair said it was not known what had gone wrong. The flying conditions had been "excellent".

The Ministry of Defence said the taxpayer would pick up the bill, as was normal in rescues in the UK and abroad. The spokesperson said it was "highly unlikely" it would recover any of the money.

Last night the men were on their way to the Chilean naval base Eduardo Frei, where HMS Endurance was to pick them up. Ms Vestey said: "They have been checked and appear to be well. I don't know what will happen to them once they have been picked up by HMS Endurance - they'll probably have their bottoms kicked and be sent home the long way."
abaozai2003
初級會員
初級會員
發表 發表於: 星期五 2004-06-18 13:15
引言回覆

不囉唆!
絕對是Breitling Emergency ,可以迅速帶我回家!
從之前的文章開始顯示:
1頁(共2頁)
前往:

無法 在這個版面發表文章
無法 在這個版面回覆文章
無法 在這個版面編輯文章
無法 在這個版面刪除文章
無法 在這個版面進行投票
無法 在這個版面上傳附加圖檔
可以 在這個版面下載已上傳之附加圖檔